Allowed

The District Collector v. Arappor Iyakkam

Madras HC1 Apr 2022WMP/5838/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.M.P. No.5838 of 2022 sought recall of an order accepting respondent clinics regarding encroachment removal. Recalling the order, the Court directed respondents to submit an action taken report, conduct a survey, and remove encroachments. Petitioned writs listed for future hearing.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 03.03.2022 recalled; Directions for action taken report and survey given; Writs listed for hearing.

The District Collector Vs Arappor Iyakkam — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.M.P.No.5838 of 2022 in W.P.No.10666 of 2019 and W.P.Nos.28401 and 28405 of 2021

¶2

W.M.P.No.5838 of 2022 in W.P.No.10666 of 2019 and

¶3

W.P.Nos.28401 and 28405 of 2021

¶4

THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J

¶5

(The Order of the Court was made by The Honourable Chief Justice)

¶6

An application in W.M.P.No.5838 of 2022 in W.P.No.10666 of 2019 has

¶7

been filed to seek recall of the order, dated 03.03.2022. The order aforesaid was passed recording the statement by the respondents that the encroachment has been removed.

¶8

The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the official respondents submits that under some confusion or understanding, the statement aforesaid was made. In fact, the encroachment is yet to be removed.

¶9

In view of the facts given above, the order dated 03.03.2022 is recalled, recording the above statement of the learned Additional Advocate General. Accordingly, W.M.P.No.5838 of 2022 is allowed.

¶10

Page No.1 / 3

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

W.M.P.No.5838 of 2022 in W.P.No.10666 of 2019 and W.P.Nos.28401 and 28405 of 2021

¶13

However, it is with the direction to the respondents to come out

¶14

with action taken report regarding the representation made by the petitioners. The action taken report would contain the details of the action taken by them to remove the encroachment and details of such encroachments. The respondents, would even conduct a survey and demarcate the land to exactly identify the encroached area and the encroachers therein, with immediate follow up action to remove the encroachment.

¶15

List W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019, 28401 of 2021 and 28405 of 2021 for

¶16

hearing on 22.04.2022.

¶17

(M.N.B., C J) (D.B.C.,J) 01.04..2022

¶18

¶19

Page No.2 / 3

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.M.P.No.5838 of 2022 in W.P.No.10666 of 2019 and W.P.Nos.28401 and 28405 of 2021

¶22

THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J

¶23

¶24

W.M.P.No.5838 of 2022 in W.P.No.10666 of 2019 and W.P.Nos.28401 and 28405 of 2021

¶25

01.04.2022

¶26

Page No.3 / 3

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The District Collector v. Arappor Iyakkam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The District Collector v. Arappor Iyakkam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Vinayagamoorthy Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Mrs.S.Ammsavalli Vs M/s. Acl Cements (P) Ltd.

A.P.Gowdhama Sidharthan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Arulmigu Sagayamadha Church, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Amit Kumar Gutgutia Vs The Central Board of Direct Taxes

P.Rosu Reddy Vs The Joint Director