N.Elankavi v. S.Rajamani
Case brief
What is this about?
4539 of 2022 in W.P.Nos. 19422 & 19425 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.Nos. 4520 & 4539 of 2022 in
W.P.Nos. 19422 & 19425 of 2020
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.
The learned counsel for the
petitioners have no objection for
allowing the above petitions.
- In view of the above, the
inpleading petitions are allowed.
- The Registry is directed to
amend the cause title.
12.04.2022
mrn
Coram
D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court