Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

S.Balamurugan, Vs The Chairman,Tangedco — Madras HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2022
S.Balamurugan, Vs The Chairman,TangedcoS.Balamurugan, v. The Chairman,Tangedco

Disposed

S.Balamurugan, v. The Chairman,Tangedco

Madras HC20 Sept 2022WMP/4423/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Responding to the affiant's reasons, the court accepted the petition and ordered the inclusion of a proposed party as the 6th respondent.

What did the court decide?

The proposed party is impleaded as the 6th respondent.

What the court decided

Cite this judgement

S.Balamurugan, v. The Chairman,Tangedco, WMP/4423/2022 (MAD), decided on 20 September 2022.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.SUBRAMANIAN

Parties & counsel

AI extract

Outcome

The proposed party is impleaded as the 6th respondent.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

On the petition's acceptance of the affiant's reasons, the respondent is impleaded as the sixth respondent, signifying this is an interlocutory procedural order linking parties.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

W.M.P.No.4423 of 2022 in W.P.No.21580 of 2018

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the proposed party is impleaded as the 6^th respondent.

20.09.2022

dsa

Page No.1/1

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Coram

AI extract

R.SUBRAMANIAN

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 20 Sept 2022 · September
Registered: 23 Feb 2022
Case no.: WMP/4423/2022
CNR: HCMA010235122022
Bench: R. Subramanian
Disposal: ALLOWED

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. Subramanian

Wellington Gymkhana Club Vs Central Information Commission
19 Sept 2022
S.Purushothaman Vs The Inspector General of
19 Sept 2022
C.Muthusamy Vs The District Collector
19 Sept 2022
Punjab Association Vs Director of Matriculation
20 Sept 2022
R.Veloo, Vs The Secretary to Government
20 Sept 2022
N.Manivanna Perumal Vs The Assistant General Manager
20 Sept 2022