The High Court of Madras dismissed the miscellaneous petition as infructuous on the counsel's submission that the matter was no longer alive, concluding that nothing survived for adjudication.
The miscellaneous petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.20872 of 2018
M. GOVINDARAJ, J.
W.M.P.No.20872 of 2018 in W.P.No.5705 of 2009
The present Miscellaneous Petition is filed to set aside the order dated 12.03.2018 made in W.P.No.5705 of 2009 and restore the Writ Petition to be heard on merit.
Recording the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
23.03.2022
asi
W.M.P.No.20872 of 2018
M. GOVINDARAJ, J.
asi
W.M.P.No.20872 of 2018 in W.P.No.5705 of 2009
23.03.2022
M. Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
