3.3. The respondent repeatedly approached the fourth appellant herein to approve the appointment of the said A.Jeyaraj as Office Assistant, but there was no response for nearly ten long years. They again sent a proposal to the fourth appellant on 03.11.2017 and on receipt of the same, the fourth appellant vide proceedings in O.Mu.No. 3931/A3/2017, dated Nil.01.2018, sought for certain information and vide proceedings dated 16.11.2018, also sought additional particulars. In response to the same, the respondent vide letter dated 26.02.2019, furnished all the documents to the fourth appellant. Thereafter, the third appellant / Chief Educational Officer vide proceedings dated 25.09.2020, returned the said proposal by directing the respondent to comply with the provisions of Clause 3(x) of G.O.Ms.No.238, School Education [Pa.Ka. 6(1)] Department, dated 13.11.2018, wherein, it has been stated that if there is any sanctioned vacancy to be filled up in the aided school, it should be filled up by the surplus post available in the other aided schools, instead of making fresh appointments. Aggrieved by the same, the respondent filed the writ petition, which was allowed by the Writ Court. Therefore, the Government has come forward with the present writ appeal, to set aside the order of the learned Judge.
