P.Jeevanadam v. M.Pandian
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ appeal was withdrawn by the appellant after seeking and obtaining permission from the Court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Writ Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
W.A.(MD)No.446 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.A.(MD)No.446 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD)No.4293 of 2022
P.Jeevanadam ... Appellant / 5th Respondent
-Vs-
1.M.Pandian ... 1st Respondent / Writ Petitioner
2.The District Collector,
Office of the Collectorate
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P. Jeevanadam
- respondent
M. Pandian
- respondent
The District Collector
- respondent
The General Manager
- respondent
The Deputy Registrar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court