S.Premkumar v. the Commissioner of Revenue
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment disposes of a writ appeal against an order setting aside a seniority fix. The court noted that revised seniority panels had been published following the Apex Court order in S.L.P. No.2886 of 2016, thereby meeting the prayer of the appellants. No further orders were required, and the appeal was disposed of with no costs.
What the court decided
W.A(MD)No.413 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 28.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.A(MD)No.413 of 2021 and
CMP(MD)Nos.1541, 10339 and 6293 of 2021
- S.Premkumar
- P.Arockia Britto
- V.Marx
- M.Muthu Vinayagam
- A.Antony Samy
- P.Murugesan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the seniority dispute of Revenue Assistants in Dindigul District has been resolved by the publication of revised seniority panels under the new guidelines.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Premkumar and others
- respondent
The Commissioner of Revenue Administration and Disaster Management
Coram
R.Mahadevan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court