The writ appeal, filed to pray for a vigilance enquiry against university officials, was dismissed as withdrawn. The court granted liberty to approach competent authorities for an enquiry but clarified it was not a direction.
Writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach competent authority for vigilance enquiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A.NO.395 OF 2022
B.Sivakumar
... Appellant/Petitioner
.Vs.
PRAYER:-
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 18.11.2021 in W.P.No.24628 of 2021.
PRAYER IN W.P.NO.24628 OF 2021:-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing
the 1st Respondent/Vice Chancellor of Anna University to conduct an enquiry by constituting a committee and pass.
For the Appellant :
Mr.A.J.Mohamed Kassim
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to approach the competent authority seeking a vigilance enquiry.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sasi
To
W.A.NO.395 OF 2022
RSI(CO)
PBS/10/03/2022
B. Sivakumar
The Vice Chancellor, Anna University
The Registrar, Anna University
The Controller of Examinations, Anna University
The Principal, School of Architecture College
Munishwar Nath Bhandari
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
