This writ appeal challenging an order refusing to register a document without an N.O.C. stands dismissed as infructuous because the registering authority released the documents by the time of hearing.
The writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.A.No.1878 of 2012
... Appellants vs
1.Mohamed Saleem
2.Ayesha Saleem
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act against the order dated 30.03.2012 passed in W.P. No.7915 of 2012 on the file of this Court.
Prayer in W.P. No.7915 of 2012:Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to register and return the Document No.P.53/2011, Receipt No.20113500, dated 30.06.2011 to the petitioners without insisting for the No Objection Certificate.
JUDGMENT
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the documents in question were released by the registering authority on 20.12.2012, making this writ appeal infructuous.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, this writ appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vga
To
W.A.No.1878 of 2012
KSV[co]
NSK 16/05/2022
Inspector General of Registration and The Sub Registrar
Mohamed Saleem
Ayesha Saleem
T. Raja
S. Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
