Disposed

Sathya Priya v. R.Sridharan

Madras HC14 Dec 2022TR CMP/831/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Upon parties' undertaking to resume the matrimonial home, the High Court of Madras disposed of a transfer petition and connected miscellaneous petitions by withdrawing a restitution of conjugal rights case pending in Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions disposed of as closed upon parties' undertaking to withdraw restitution case and resume matrimonial home. No order as to costs.

Sathya Priya Vs R.Sridharan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P.No.831 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.No.831 of 2022 and

¶7

C.M.P.Nos.14403 & 16358 of 2022

Sathiya Priya

... Petitioner

Vs.

R.Sridharan ... Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Transfer CMP is filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the HMOP No.71 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram and to transfer the same to the Family Court at Chennai.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Thirumalai For Respondent : Mr.C.Munusamy

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

The petition for transfer is filed to withdraw the HMOP No.71 of

¶16

2021 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram and to transfer the same to the Family Court at Chennai.

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Tr.C.M.P.No.831 of 2022

¶20

The petitioner and the respondent are present before this Court and with the efforts of the respective learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties to the lis on hand, they have decided to resume the matrimonial home and accordingly, given their individual undertaking that they will withdraw the case filed in HMOP No.71 of 2021 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram and go for reunion.

¶21

The HMOP No.71 of 2021 filed by the respondent for Restitution

¶22

of Conjugal Rights on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Villupram stands withdrawn. Thus, no further adjudication is required and consequently, the Tr.C.M.P.No.831 of 2022 stands disposed of as closed in view of the undertaking given by the parties for reunion. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶23

14.12.2022

¶24

Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order

¶25

Page 2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Tr.C.M.P.No.831 of 2022

¶28

¶29

1.The Judge, Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram.

¶30

2.The Judge, Family Court, Chennai.

¶31

Page 3 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Tr.C.M.P.No.831 of 2022

¶34

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

¶35

Jeni

¶36

Tr.C.M.P.No.831 of 2022

¶37

14.12.2022

¶38

Page 4 of 4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sathya Priya v. R.Sridharan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathya Priya v. R.Sridharan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Jayaraman Vs S.Subramaniam

Shanmugam, Vs Immaculate Sheela

Kuppan Vs Mallika

P.Eswari Vs P.Balamani

P. Priya Vs E. Anbumani

R.Dinakaran Vs Rajajthi