Allowed

S.Deepikalakshmi v. T.Rabindranath

Madras HC4 Jan 2022TR CMP/253/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mr. Justice R. Subramanian allowed a transfer petition seeking to move a divorce case filed under the Hindu Marriage Act from the Family Court, Chengalpattu, to the Family Court, Chennai. The transfer was granted without pronouncing on the substantive allegations in the petitioner's affidavit.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of FCOP No.38 of 2021 from Family Court, Chengalpattu to Family Court, Chennai.

S.Deepikalakshmi Vs T.Rabindranath — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.01.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶5

Tr.C.M.P.No.253 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.6909 of 2021

¶6

S.Deepikalakshmi ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

T.Rabindranath ... Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, praying to withdraw the case in FCOP.No.38 of 2021 on the file of the Family Court at Chengalpattu and transfer the same to the Family Court at Chennai to be tried on merits.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mrs.S.Vasanthi

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.A.Rajeshkanna

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner seeks transfer of FCOP.No.38 of 2021 on the file of the Family Court, Chengelpattu to the Family Court, Chennai. The said petition has been filed by the husband seeking divorce under section 13(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

¶14

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/ husband would submit that he has no objection for transfer being ordered, but, he has got reservations regarding the allegations made in the affidavit filed in support of the transfer petition.

¶15

3.In the light of the above statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. FCOP.No.38 of 2021 pending on the file of the Family Court, Chengalpattu is withdrawn and transferred to the II Additional Family Court, Chennai. It is made clear that this

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Court has not pronounced upon any of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

SD/-

¶19

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY //

¶20

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶21

dsa To

¶22

The Judge, Family Court, Chengalpattu.

¶23

The II Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai.

¶24

+1cc to Mr.I.John Arockiadas, Advocate Sr.794 +1cc to Mr.A.Rajesh Kanna, Advocate Sr.430

¶25

Tr.C.M.P.No.253 of 2021

¶26

pm[co] srg 27/01/2022

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Deepikalakshmi v. T.Rabindranath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Deepikalakshmi v. T.Rabindranath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Allimuthu Vs N.Krishnamoorthy @ Kesavan

Kavitha @ Keerthi Vs J.Suresh

S.Subbu Gounder Vs K.Nirmala

S.Ulaganayagi Vs Balasubramanian

Rani Vs G.Kanmani

Chitra Ammal Vs Anand