Dismissed

Dhileeba v. a.Aravind

Madras HC12 Apr 2022TR CMP/136/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a petition seeking transfer of a matrimonial divorce case from Pondicherry to Chennai. Despite the petitioner residing abroad, the court held Tindivanam closer and directed mediation at the Pondicherry court for settlement terms. Parties agreed to mutual consent divorce.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; direction issued to allow power agent to represent petitioner and refer matter for mediation.

Dhileeba Vs a.Aravind — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 12.04.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

Mrs.Dhileeba

... Petitioner

Versus

Mr.A.Aravind

... Respondent

Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.83 of 2020 pending on the file of the Family Judge of Family Court, Pondicherry and transfer the same to the Family Court Judge at Chennai.

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This petition is filed seeking transfer of H.M.O.P.No.83 of 2020 pending on the file of the Family Judge of Family Court, Pondicherry and transfer the same to the Family Court Judge at Chennai.

¶13

The objection to the transfer raised by the respondent is that the petitioner herein is not residing in India and she is working abroad and she has authorised her sister residing at Tindivanam to represent her before the Court.

¶14

Considering the fact that Tindivanam is much closer to Pondicherry and also taking note of the no objection given by

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

the learned counsel for the respondent for the power application being ordered, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed with a direction that the Family Court, Pondicherry shall permit the power agent of the petitioner Mrs.Dhileeba to represent her before the Family Court. Parties have also agreed in principal that both are ready for a mutual consent divorce. Considering the submissions, a direction is issued to the learned Family Court Judge that, in case parties want to negotiate the terms of the settlement, the learned Judge, Family Court, Pondicherry shall refer the matter for Mediation to workout the terms of the settlement. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶19

//True Copy//

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

ssn

¶22

¶23

The Judge, The Family Court, Pondicherry.

¶24

+1cc to M/s.S.Meenakshi, Advocate, S.R.No.25181

¶25

+1cc to Mr.T.Gowthaman, Advocate, S.R.No.25452

¶26

Tr.C.M.P.No.136 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.2796 of 2022

¶27

GPL(CO) RLP(06/05/2022)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dhileeba v. a.Aravind

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhileeba v. a.Aravind

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L. Saranya Vs C. Sritharan

S.Kavitha Vs K.Palani

Vaishali Vs a.Saravanakumar

S.Janani Vs K.Ramesh

Geetha Vs Prakash

S.Keerthiga, Vs S. Anantharaj