Disposed

M/S. Kuber Jewellery v. the Income Tax Officer

Madras HC7 Feb 2022TCA/609/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of two Tax Case Appeals filed by M/s. Kuber Jewellery challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's orders on assessment reopening and undisclosed income. The court stayed the proceedings after the appellant obtained a full and final settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What did the court decide?

The Tax Case Appeals stand disposed of; connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

M/S. Kuber Jewellery Vs the Income Tax Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

T.C.A Nos.609 of 2010 and T.C.A.No.767 of 2009

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.02.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶8

Tax Case Appeal No.609 of 2010 and Tax Case Appeal No.767 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2010

¶9

M/s. Kuber Jewellery No.52, NSC Bose Road Chennai 600 079 ... Appellant in both T.C.As

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The Income Tax Officer Ward XI (1) 2^nd Floor, Kannammai Building 611, Anna Salai Chennai 600 006 ... Respondent in both T.C.As

¶12

Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'B' dated 27.02.2009 and 13.02.2009 passed in I.T.A.No.431/Mds/2007 and I.T.A.No.430/Mds/2007.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Page 1/6

¶15

T.C.A Nos.609 of 2010 and T.C.A.No.767 of 2009

¶16

For Appellant : Mr.N.Muthukumar For Respondent : Mr.T.Ravikumar Senior Standing Counsel

¶17

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T

¶18

(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)

¶19

These Tax Case Appeals have been filed by the appellant / Assessee challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench

¶20

'B' dated 27.02.2009 and 13.02.2009 passed in I.T.A.No.431/Mds/2007 and I.T.A.No.430/Mds/2007 for the Assessment Years 2000-2001 and 1999 – 2000.

¶21

2.The appeal in T.C.A.No.609 of 2010 was admitted on 16.08.2010

¶22

on the following substantial questions of law :

¶23

“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of

¶24

the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the

¶25

reopening of the assessment is valid in law?

¶26

2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the

¶27

Page 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

T.C.A Nos.609 of 2010 and T.C.A.No.767 of 2009

¶29

case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the cash credits of

¶30

Rs.5 lakhs, interest of Rs.6,92,527/- and travel expense of Rs.74,091/- represents the undisclosed income of the appellant?

¶31

3.The appeal in T.C.A.No.767 of 2009 was admitted on

¶32

07.09.2009 on the following substantial questions of law :

¶33

“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the

¶34

case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the reopening of the

¶35

assessment is valid in law?

¶36

2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the

¶37

case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the cash credits to

¶38

the extent of Rs.37,50,000/- represents the undisclosed

¶39

income of the appellant?

¶40

3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the

¶41

case, the Tribunal is right in making general observations

¶42

Page 3/6

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

T.C.A Nos.609 of 2010 and T.C.A.No.767 of 2009

¶45

with regard to the various credits aggregating Rs.37,50,000/even without considering each of the credits independently, notwithstanding that each credit is a separate item and the provisions of Section 69 will have to be applied with reference to each credit independently and not collectively?”

¶46

4.When the matters were taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant / assessee submitted that during the pendency of these tax case appeals, the assessee has availed the benefit conferred under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and filed necessary declarations, which were accepted and Form 5 / order for full and final settlement of tax arrears, was also issued by the Income tax department, on 23.04.2021. The learned counsel has also filed Form 5 dated 23.04.2021 to that effect.

¶47

5.The aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant/assessee has also been fairly conceded by the learned senior standing counsel appearing for the respondent/ Revenue.

¶48

Page 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

T.C.A Nos.609 of 2010 and T.C.A.No.767 of 2009

¶50

6.In view of the subsequent development, this court is of the opinion

¶51

that nothing survives for adjudication in these appeals. Recording the submission so made by the learned counsel on either side, the Tax Case Appeals stand disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

¶52

[R.M.D,J.] [J.S.N.P, J.] 07.02.2021

¶53

kas

¶54

Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No

¶55

¶56

1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “B” Bench

¶57

2.The Income Tax Officer Ward XI (1) 2^nd Floor, Kannammai Building 611, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006

¶58

Page 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

T.C.A Nos.609 of 2010 and T.C.A.No.767 of 2009

¶60

R. MAHADEVAN, J.

¶61

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶62

kas

¶63

Tax Case Appeal No.609 of 2010 and Tax Case Appeal No.767 of 2009

¶64

07.02.2022

¶65

Page 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/S. Kuber Jewellery v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Kuber Jewellery v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Commissioner of Wealth Vs Smt M.Banumathy

Babu Apparels Vs the Income Tax Officer

Commissioner of Income TAX-1 Vs Shri J.Ramu