Dismissed

P. Prabakaran v. T.K.Rajendran, IPS

Madras HC7 Jun 2022SUB A(MD)/167/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a Sub Application seeking to re-open a contempt petition for issuing a statutory notice. The court held that reopening was unnecessary as the petitioner had already been appointed as a Grade-II Constable and was undergoing training.

What did the court decide?

Petition to re-open the contempt petition for issuing statutory notice dismissed as not necessary.

P. Prabakaran Vs T.K.Rajendran, IPS — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

SUB A(MD) No.167 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Seventh day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶6

SUB A(MD) No.167 of 2021 IN

¶7

CONT P(MD) No.360 of 2014

¶8

P.PRABAKARAN

¶9

... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

¶10

¶11

T.K.RAJENDRAN, IPS, THE CHAIRMAN,

¶12

TAMIL NADU UNIFORMED SERVICES BOARD,

¶13

NO.807, P.T.LEE CHENGALVARAYA NAICKER MALIGAI, ANNA SALAI,

¶14

CHENNAI - 600 002.

¶15

C.SYLENDRA BABU, I.P.S, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, O/O. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

¶16

HEAD OFFICE,

¶17

CHENNAI - 600 004.

¶18

MANOHAR, I.P.S. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT,

¶19

VIRUDHUNAGAR. ... RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS/ RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to Re-Open the Contempt Petition in Contempt Petition(MD).No.360 of 2014 for issuing Statutory Notice to the Contemnors/Respondents.

¶21

Prayer in CONT P(MD).360/2014 :

¶22

To issue statutory Notice and punish the respondent under provisions of Contempt of Court Act 1971, for willful and deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Honourable Court in WP. No. 3056/2013 dated 26.03.2013.

¶23

Prayer in WP(MD). 3056/2013 :

¶24

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified

¶25

1/3

¶26

SUB A(MD) No.167 of 2021

¶27

Mandamus, to call for the impugned order passed by the 3rd Respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. A-2(1)/26187/2012 dated 22.01.2013 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Grade II Police Constable in the Common Recruitment of Grade II Police Constables/Grade II Jail Warders/Firemen 2012.

¶28

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.V.MUNIASAMY, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.VEERA KATHIRAVAN, Additional Advocate General for MR.D.GANDHIRAJ, Special Government Pleader on behalf of the Respondents, the court made the following order:-

¶29

This is a petition to re-open the contempt petition in Cont.P. (MD).No.360 of 2014 for issuing statutory notice to the contemnors/respondents.

¶30

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.Veera Kathiravan, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents assisted by Mr.D.Gandhiraj, learned Special Government Pleader, submitted that the petitioner had been appointed as GradeII Constable and is undergoing training. The copy of the appointment order is also produced before this Court for perusal.

¶31

Considering the fact that the petitioner had been appointed as Grade-II Constable and undergoing training, this Court is of the view that nothing survives in this petition and it is not necessary to re-open the contempt petition.

¶32

In this view of the matter, the Sub Application is dismissed as not necessary.

sd/-

07/06/2022

/ TRUE COPY /

09/06/2022

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶38

¶39

T.K.RAJENDRAN, IPS, THE CHAIRMAN,

¶40

TAMIL NADU UNIFORMED SERVICES BOARD, NO.807, P.T.LEE CHENGALVARAYA NAICKER MALIGAI, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 002.

¶41

C.SYLENDRA BABU, I.P.S, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, O/O. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ HEAD OFFICE, CHENNAI - 600 004.

¶43

2/3

¶44

SUB A(MD) No.167 of 2021

¶45

MANOHAR, I.P.S. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, VIRUDHUNAGAR.

¶46

+1. C.C. to M/S.V.MUNIASAMY, Advocate SR.No.24461 (F), DATE : 07.06.2022.

¶47

ORDER IN SUB A(MD) No.167 of 2021 IN CONT P(MD) No.360 of 2014 Date :07/06/2022

¶48

akv USK/PN/SAR-II/09.06.2022/3P/5C

¶49

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶50

3/3

P. Prabakaran v. T.K.Rajendran, IPS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Prabakaran v. T.K.Rajendran, IPS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanmugavelsamy, Vs the Director General of Police

S.Periyasamy Vs the District Collector and

South India Music Companies Vs Gemini Audio & Gemini

M.Mahendran, Vs the Presiding Officer

M.Nirmala, Vs the District Elementary

A.Muthupetchi, Vs the Labour Officer