Vaithialingam, v. Dharmar
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for default as the first appellant had passed away and the other two appellants failed to appear despite notice.
What the court decided
S.A(MD).No.661 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
S.A(MD).No.661 of 2010 and M.P(MD).No.1 of 2010
1.Vaithialingam 2.Rajasekar
3.Kalavathy
.... Appellants/Respondents 1to3/ Plaintiffs
Vs.
1.Dharmar 2.Arunachalam 3.Selvaraj 4.Chandra 5.Lalitha 6.Pushpavalli
7.Chandra Ammal .. Respondents/Respondents 4 to 10/ Defendants 1 to 7 8.Sathyanarayanan ... Respondents/Appellants/ Defendants-8
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2008 passed by the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirapalli in A.S.No.45 of 2008 confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.09.2007 passed by the I Additional Sub Judge, Tiruchirappalli in O.S.No.11 of 1999.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vaithialingam
- petitioner
Rajasekar
- petitioner
Kalavathy
- respondent
Dharmar
- respondent
Arunachalam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court