Second Appeal filed under CPC S. 100 was dismissed for default due to the appellant's absence with no instructions available on the date of hearing.
None granted. Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A(MD).No.519 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.07.2022
CORAM: JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
S.A(MD).No.519 of 2010 and M.P(MD).No.1 of 2010, M.P(MD).No.1 of 2012, M.P(MD).No.1 of 2014 and M.P(MD).No.1 of 2015
P.S.Sivasamy
.... 3rd Defendant/Appellant/ Appellant
Vs.
1.M.Karumanan(Died) ... Plaintiff/1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent Maragatham (Died) ... 1st Defendant/2nd Respondent 2.M.Shobana ... 2nd defendant/3rd Respondent/ 2nd Respondent 3.Palaniyammal 4.Ramanathan 5.Manimegalai 6.Seethalakshmi ... Respondents
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 made in A.S.No.33 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Karur in confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.01.2008 made in O.S.No.720 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Karur.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Govindarajan For Respondents : R1 died R2 dispense with Mr.M.P.Senthil (R3 to R6)
S.A(MD).No.519 of 2010
J U D G M E N T
N.SESHASAYEE, J.,
rmk
Today, the matter is listed under the caption 'for withdrawal'. When the matter is called, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that 'no instructions'.
11.07.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmk To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Karur. 2.The Additional District Munsif, Karur. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.A(MD).No.519 of 2010
P.S.Sivasamy
M.Karumanan
Maragatham
M.Shobana
Palaniyammal
Ramanathan
N.Seshasayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
