Ganesan v. v.Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry set to entertain restoration petition upon payment of Rs.10,000/- costs.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; restoration petition entertainable upon payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.472 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.04.2022 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.472 of 2010
Ganesan ...Appellant / Appellant / Defendant
-Vs-
1.V.Krishnan (died)
2.C.Pushpanathan ...Respondents / Respondents / Plaintiffs
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and decree of the learned Principal Sub Judge, Trichirappalli in A.S.No.233/07 on 30.07.2008 confirming decree and judgment of O.S.No.17 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Musiri on 24.03.2006.
For Appellant : No appearance For R2 : Mr.K.Govindarajan
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported 'no instructions'. The case is posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. The name of the appellant is printed. There is no representation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ganesan
- respondent
V.Krishnan
- respondent
C.Pushpanathan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court