Petchimuthu v. Thangaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC as abated due to the death of the sole appellant prior to the hearing.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)No.404 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.404 of 2005
Petchimuthu ...Appellant
-Vs-
Thangaraj ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi, made in A.S.No.39 of 2003, dated 26.09.2003, which is passed confirming the decree and judgment of the District Munsif Court, Shencottah, made in O.S.No.73 of 2003, dated 07.04.2003.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Ramesh @ Ramiah
For Respondent : Mr.N.Ganagasapapathy
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Petchimuthu
- respondent
Thangaraj
Coram
S.Sounthar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court