Allowed

P.a.Kumarasamy Raj v. Maniraja

Madras HC20 Apr 2022SA(MD)/369/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Second Appeal was preferred under Section 100 CPC against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur, confirming the lower court's decision in a suit regarding property partition. The High Court allowed the second appeal and remitted the matter to the Subordinate Court for a new measurement of property with reference to title documents.

What did the court decide?

Judgment and Decree of Subordinate Court remitted to first Appellate Court to appoint a new Advocate Commissioner for measuring properties with reference to title documents.

P.a.Kumarasamy Raj Vs Maniraja — Partition | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

SA(MD). No.369 of 2010

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶3

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶4

Wednesday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶7

SA(MD). No.369 of 2010

¶8

P.A.Kumarasamy Raja

¶9

Raju ... Appellants/Appellants/Defendants

¶10

¶11

Maniraja (Died)

¶12

Krishnakumari ... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs

¶13

Prayer:-

¶14

Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur, dated 27.11.2006 made in Appeal Suit No.52 of 2005, confirming the judgment and decree of the court of the Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur made in Original Suit No. 277 of 2004 dated 30.03.2005.

¶15

DECREE:-

¶16

This Second Appeal coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the Grounds of Appeal, the judgments and decrees of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First Instance and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mrs.LAKSHMI GOPINATHAN, Advocate for the Appellants and of Mr.V.PANNEERSELVAM, Advocate for the 2^nd Respondent, this Court while allowing the Second Appeal, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶17

(1) That the Judgment and Decree of the the Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur, dated 27.11.2006 made in Appeal Suit No.52 of 2005, confirming the judgment and decree of the court of the Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur made in Original Suit No. 277 of 2004 dated 30.03.2005 be and hereby set aside and the matter is remitted to the first Appellate Court viz. the Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur;

¶18

(2) that, the first Appellate Court viz. the Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur be and hereby directed to appoint a new Advocate Commissioner, so that the properties of both the parties https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ are measured with reference to their respective title documents;

¶19

1/2

¶20

SA(MD). No.369 of 2010

¶21

(3) that, the parties shall appear before the the first Appellate Court viz. the Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur on 13.06.2022 through counsel and

¶22

(4) that, there be no costs in this Appeal.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶27

To 1) The Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur. 2) The Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur. Copy to: The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 2 Copies +1 CC to M/S.POLAX LEGAL SOLUTIONS, Advocate ( SR-19900 ) +1 CC to Mr.V.PANNEER SELVAM, Advocate ( SR-20256 )

¶28

ORDER DATED : 20/04/2022 ========================== DECREE ==========================

¶29

SA(MD). No.369 of 2010

¶30

Nature of Decree:- Allowing the Second Appeal preferred against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur, dated 27.11.2006 made in Appeal Suit No.52 of 2005, confirming the judgment and decree of the court of the Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur made in Original Suit No. 277 of 2004 dated 30.03.2005 and etc., as stated within.

¶31

svs(CO) TR(08.06.2022) 2P 7C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

P.a.Kumarasamy Raj v. Maniraja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.a.Kumarasamy Raj v. Maniraja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chellammal, Vs Thangam Finance Company

K.Andiappan Vs S.Suresh

G.Subramanian, Vs S.S.Swaminathan

A.Jeyalakshmi Vs D.Premkumar

Muthayyan(Died) Vs Thankammal

R.Velayutham Asari (Died) Vs P.Krishnammal