Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Jegabar Ali Vs Noorjahan — Madras HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2022
Jegabar Ali Vs NoorjahanJegabar Ali v. Noorjahan

Dismissed

Jegabar Ali v. Noorjahan

Madras HC20 Jun 2022SA(MD)/11/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suitability of dismissal of appeal for default due to non-appearance of appellants. The appeal was dismissed under Section 100 of CPC.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed for default.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

S.A.(MD) No.11 of 2012

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 20.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

S.A.(MD) No.11 of 2012

1.Jegabar Ali 2.Jerina Begam ... Appellants/Appellants/

Plaintiffs

-vs-

1.Noorjahan 2.Basheer Mohammed

3.Akbar Ali

4.Shahila Banu

5.Balgees Beevi ... Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants 1, 2, 6, 7 & 8

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Jegabar Ali
appellant
Jerina Begam
respondent
Noorjahan
respondent
Basheer Mohammed
respondent
Akbar Ali
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 20 Jun 2022 · June
Registered: 5 Jan 2012
Case no.: SA(MD)/11/2012

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from N. Seshasayee

Krishnammal Vs K.Subbaraj
17 Jun 2022
Aazhvarsamy Nayakkar Vs Chellammal
17 Jun 2022
N. Angaleshwari, Vs Nallakutti
16 Jun 2022
Kaliyamoorthy Vs Liyakath Ali
20 Jun 2022
Rathinammal(Rethinathammal) Vs Nagarajan

Cite this judgement

Jegabar Ali v. Noorjahan, SA(MD)/11/2012 (MAD), decided on 20 June 2022.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

N.Seshasayee

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Appeal dismissed for default.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The appeal was dismissed for default as the appellants made no appearance before the Court. No costs were awarded. The judgment determines only the procedural default.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Prayer:- Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 04.11.2009 made in A.S.No.85 of 2007 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2006 made in O.S.No.423 of 2011 on the file of II Additional District Munsif Court cum Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Chandrasekar

There is no representation for the appellants for the second consecutive time. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

// True Copy //

/06/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

1/2

S.A.(MD) No.11 of 2012

abr

To

1.The Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam.

2.The II Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam.

S.A.(MD) No.11 of 2012

KG(CO) TR(27.06.2022) 2P 3C

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2/2

Shahila Banu

Coram

AI extract

N.Seshasayee

CNR

HCMD010014682012

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

20 Jun 2022

A.Vijayalakshmi (Died) Vs C.Palanisamy

20 Jun 2022