Kasi v. Ramu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras, in Second Appeal No. 805 of 2022, dismissed the appeal filed by a plaintiff against the dismissal of his suit for permanent injunction. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove his exclusive title or interest in the suit property and that the case of relinquishment by siblings remained unproven.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
What the court decided
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant has proved that the suit property is his exclusive ancestral property as pleaded.
Whether the claim of relinquishment by siblings is substantiated by evidence in a property partition dispute.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kasi
- respondent
Ramu
- respondent
Chellammal (Died)
- respondent
Soodamani
- respondent
Rajendran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court