Ponnusamy v. Kuppusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC as withdrawn by the counsel for the appellants after seeking and obtaining permission. Consequently, the connected memorandum of appeal was closed.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected M.P. closed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
S.A. No.485 of 2013
and
M.P.No. 1 of 2013
- Ponnusamy, S/o. Ramasamy Gounder
- Sellappan, S/o. Ponnusamy ...Appellants Versus
- Kuppusamy, S/o. Late Komarappa Gounder
- Ramalingam, S/o. Late Komarappa Gounder ...Respondents
Prayer:-Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2012 made in A.S.No.13 of 2011 on the file of Sub-Court, Namakkal confirming the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2010 passed in O.S.No.25 of 2006, on the file of District Munsif Court, Paramathi.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ponnusamy
- appellant
Sellappan
- respondent
Kuppusamy
- respondent
Ramalingam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court