father and his wife, both were died in the year of 1950. Thereafter Sellapa Gounder alone enjoyed the property. Besides, Sellappa Gounder purchased certain item of the property in the year 1966 thereafter partition was held between the Sellappa Gounder and his son Kuppusamy on 15.04.1966 thereby share allotted to Sellapa Gounder's son alone. At any point of time Nallamal was not enjoyed the property and she was oustested from the suit property even before 1950 thereby totally denied the plaintiff right over the property. Further, the defendant contended that on 28.04.1998 she purchased property from the Sellappa Gounder for valid consideration and the patta also transferred in her favour and her husband Kuppusamy have no cordial relationship with plaintiff's mother Kalliamal after the separation from her said Kuppusamy married the defendant and begotten children and the suit property is in her possession, prayed to dimsiss the suit. Before the Trial Court issues were framed both the parties were adduced their evidence and documents, on considering oral and documentary evidence the Trial Court finally held that the plaintiff failed to prove on which way the Nallamal (Maternal Grand Mother of the plaintiff) entitled for the suit
