Devarajan v. Kumaravel
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Second Appeal as abated due to the death of one of the respondents, noting the appellant failed to take steps to substitute the deceased or obtain instructions from his client.
What did the court decide?
No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
S.A.NO.1454 OF 2011 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2011
Devarajan ... Appellant
.Vs.
- Kumaravel
- Varadha Gounder ... Respondents
PRAYER:-
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and the decree dated 01.07.2011 made in A.S.No.40 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Harur, confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.07.2010 made in O.S.No.159 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif, Harur and prays to set aside the same.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Arulmurugan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal abates upon the death of the second respondent without substitution.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Devarajan
- respondent
Kumaravel
- respondent
Varadha Gounder
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court