Munusamy v. Sengeni
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.04.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.Nos. 1145 & 1146 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2008, 1, 1, 2, 2 and 3, 3 of 2010 Munusamy ... Appellant in S.A.No.1145 of 2008 1.Munusamy (Deceased) 2.Chinnappa 3.Chandrasekar 4.Pushpa 5.Rajendran 6.Shankar 7.Latha ... Appellant in S.A.No.1146 of 2008 Vs. 1.Sengeni 2.Subramani ... Respondents in S.A.No.1145 of 2008 Sengeni ... Respondent in S.A.No.1146 of 2008
Common Prayer : Second Appeals filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 25.03.2008 in A.S.Nos.78 & 79/2005, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Gingee, reversing the decree and judgment dated 30.07.2004, in O.S.Nos.146/1996 & 402/2000, on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Gingee.
In both S.As:
For Appellants : Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.T.Jayalakshmi for M/s.Paul & Paul
COMMON JUDGMENT
It is seen from the records that Sengeni (first respondent in S.A.No.1145 of 2008 and sole respondent in S.A.No.1146 of 2008) died long back and till date no steps have been taken by the appellants to implead the legal heirs of the deceased respondent.
2.In view of the above, the Second Appeals stand abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Munusamy and others
- respondent
Sengeni
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court