N.Sukumar v. T.Prakash
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed two review applications as infructuous because the prayers sought were no longer relevant at the time of hearing. Connected miscellaneous petitions were subsequently closed.
What did the court decide?
Both review applications dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
Review Application Nos.60 and 61 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Review Application Nos.60 and 61 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.4883 & 4885 of 2022
N.Sukumar
... Petitioner in both Rev. Applns.
Vs.
T.Praksh Rep. by its Power of Attorney S.Thiagarajan
... Respondents in both Rev. Applns.
Common Prayer : The Petitions are filed under Order XLVII Rule-1 of Code of Civil Procedure, to Review the order and decree dated 01.02.2021 in C.R.P.Nos. 4057 & 4056 of 2015 respectively, on the file of this Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Sukumar
- respondent
T.Praksh
Coram
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court