Lakshmi v. Suriyaganthi
Case brief
What is this about?
A review application under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC against the High Court 's judgment in a second appeal was dismissed. The Court held the grounds raised were sufficient for further appeal but not for review.
What did the court decide?
Review Application is dismissed. No costs.
What the court decided
Rev.Aplc.No.41 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
Rev.Aplc.No.41 of 2022
1.Lakshmi
2.Minor Akash
3.Minor Harish Minors are represented by their natural Guardian Lakshmi ...Petitioner Vs
1.Suriyaganthi
2.Ayyappan
3.Rajamanickam 4.Parandhaman
... Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the grounds raised for review constitute an error apparent on the face of the record or a new and important matter warranting review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
Whether the High Court is inclined to entertain a review application where the grounds are merely grounds for filing a further appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lakshmi
- petitioner
Minor Akash
- petitioner
Minor Harish
- respondent
Suriyaganthi
- respondent
Ayyappan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court