In a review application under Order 47 of CPC, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court held that the former President of the Panchayat lacked locus standi and found no error apparent on the face of the record, thus dismissing the review.
The review application stands closed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Review Application (MD)No.97 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.12.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Review Application (MD)No.97 of 2022 in
W.P(MD)No.13532 of 2012
P.Ravichandran ... Review Petitioner/
Respondent-3
Vs.
PRAYER : Review Application filed under Order 47, Rule 1 & 2 and Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code, to review the order, dated 04.07.2022, passed in W.P(MD)No.13532 of 2012 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Gnanasekaran For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff For R-4 & R-5 : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader
1/4
Review Application (MD)No.97 of 2022
ORDER
The present Review Application has been filed alleging that
there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the order of this Court in W.P(MD)No.13532 of 2012, dated 04.07.2022.
President of the Panchayat has filed this review application on the ground that, certain factors have not been brought to the notice of the Court when orders were passed. In fact, at the time of passing of the orders, the third respondent has also been heard and orders have been passed.
have granted assignment in favour of the writ petitioners. Due to some reasons, the order of assignment was cancelled by the second respondent herein, without issuing notice to the assignees. Since there was no allegation of ineligibility of the writ petitioners with regard to grant of
assignment, this Court has not remitted the matter to the second https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4
Review Application (MD)No.97 of 2022
respondent herein. However, this Court has already granted liberty to the official respondents to initiate resumption proceedings in case, if they feel that the land is required for any public purpose.
02.12.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No btr To
3/4
Review Application (MD)No.97 of 2022
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
btr
Order made in Review Application (MD)No.97 of 2022
Dated: 02.12.2022
4/4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the former President of the Panchayat has locus standi to file a review application.
Whether there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the earlier order.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Ravichandran
Sasikala
Kanagavalli
Manickavalli
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District
The Tahsildar, Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District
R. Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
