3. The only ground raised in this review application is that the writ petitioner / first respondent has not disclosed the fact that the review petitioners have filed suits in O.S.Nos.201 and 199 of 2015, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukottai, for permanent injunction restraining the revenue official from interfering in their peaceful possession and enjoyment and on 20.06.2018, ex-parte decree was passed in favour of the review petitioners. The learned counsel appearing for the review petitioners submitted that the review petitioners have engaged a counsel in the writ petition and filed vakalat to represent the facts before this Court. But, unfortunately, the counsel was absent on the date of hearing and he could not represent the facts before this Court. Taking advantage of the absence of the counsel for the review petitioners, the writ petitioner as well as the official respondents had deliberately suppressed the civil suits and obtained the order of eviction behind the back of the review petitioners and hence, order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.13729 of 2019 is liable to be interfered with.
