Road, Thiruvallur Town has been administered by the respondent herein and the same was taken on lease by the appellant by way of filing an Application in A.No.3645 of 2006 in C.S. No.204 of 1940, which came to be allowed by this Court on 13.08.2007, by granting lease for a period of six years starting from 01.09.2007 on a monthly rent of Rs.15,000/- and this Court further directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs.2,00,000/as security deposit for the due performance of the obligation under the contract of lease. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant further submitted that as the copy of the order dated 13.08.2007 was received by the appellant only on 29.09.2007, the security deposit was made only on 12.10.2007. As directed by this Court, the lease could not be executed in time and therefore, the appellant was not able to hand over the possession. Hence, the appellant took out an application in A.No.4838 of 2008 in A.No.3645 of 2006 in C.S. No.204 of 1940 seeking to modify the order dated 13.08.2007 and this Court, by order dated 23.01.2009 modified the order dated 13.08.2007 in respect of the commencement of tenancy, whereby the date of the original tenancy i.e. 01.09.2007 was modified as 01.01.2009 and directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- over and above the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- that was already paid as security deposit. This Court, while observing that if the appellant deposits the said sum of Rs.50,000/- on or before 31.01.2009, the respondent shall execute the lease deed in favour of the appellant and the lease shall commence from 01.01.2009 on a monthly rent of Rs.15,000/-, directed the A.G.&.O.T. to hand over possession of the above mentioned property on such deposit of Rs.50,000/- + Rs.15,000/- being the monthly rent from January 2009. Pursuant to the modification order dated 23.01.2009, a sum of Rs.50,000/- was deposited by the appellant on 28.01.2009 and subsequently, a lease agreement for a period of six years commencing from 01.01.2009, came to be executed by the Official Trustee in favour of the appellant on 19.06.2009. Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that after taking the above property for lease, availing finance from many people, incurring a sum of Rs.20,00,000/-, the appellant had put up a false ceiling and running a hotel business under the name and style of 'Hotel Vasavi Jeeva Bhavan'. While so, by letter dated 06.11.2014, the Official Trustee had informed the appellant that the period of lease was coming to an end on 31.12.2014 and directed the appellant to quit and deliver the vacant possession on or before the above said date. In the above circumstances, the appellant took out another Application No.8475 of 2019 before this Court seeking to extend the lease period for a further tenure of six years and the same was allowed by this Court on 08.11.2019, directing the appellant to pay a sum of
