Mary Magdalane Vs Nil

¶1

1

¶2

O.P.No.219 of 2022

¶3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶4

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

¶5

2.This original petition has been filed taking advantage of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking Succession Certificate with respect to the debt of A.Victor Frank, the brother of the petitioner. He died intestate on 22.06.2020 as a bachelor. The petitioner is his sole Class II legal heir.

¶6

3.After necessary procedures were completed, the petitioner was invited to adduce evidence. The petitioner examined herself as PW-1. Her Identity Card and Adhaar Card were marked as Exs.P1 and P2. The death certificate of her father Arulanandam was marked as Ex.P5. The death certificate of her brother A.Victor Frank was marked as Ex.P6. The death certificate of her mother Caroline was marked as Ex.P7. The relationship certificate between the petitioner and her deceased brother, A.Victor Frank, was marked as Ex.P8. The statement by the Indian Overseas Bank and the

¶7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶8

2

¶9

Indian Bank were marked as Exs.P10 to P20.

¶10

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶11

smv

¶12

4.In view of the evidence adduced, this Original Petition stands allowed. The Succession Certificate is to be issued in the name of the petitioner, Mary Magdalane.

28.10.2022

smv

O.P.No.219 of 2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mary Magdalane v. Nil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mary Magdalane v. Nil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Valli Arunachalam and Another Vs Nil

Ram Chandra Menon Vs No Respondent

P.Kiran Kumar Vs State by

Jenet a.B.Haridas Vs No Respondent

Suleka Sethupathy Vs No Respondent

C.R.Rajalakshmi (Deceased) 1.Mrs.R.Gayathri and another Vs R.Ashalakshmi and 6 others