Allowed

Arjjun Chander v. G.v.Subramaniam

Madras HC17 Oct 2022OP/113/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court examined evidence regarding the last will and testament of deceased Shanthi Subramaniam. Finding no reason to doubt its execution, the judge granted Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the petitioner, directing him to execute a bond and render annual accounts.

What did the court decide?

Directing petitioner to administer deceased estate, execute a bond of Rs. 25,000, and render annual accounts.

Arjjun Chander Vs G.v.Subramaniam — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

O.P.No.113 of 2022

¶2

O.P.No.113 of 2022

¶3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶4

This Original Petition has been filed seeking grant of Letters of Administration under Sections 232 & 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 with Will annexed, relating to the last Will and testament dated 29.10.2015 executed by Mrs.Shanthi Subramaniam who died on 12.01.2020.

¶5

The petitioner is her nephew and beneficiary under the Will. The respondent is her husband. It is stated that the deceased and the respondent did not have any children.

¶6

After following due procedure the petitioner was invited to adduce evidence. He examined himself as P.W.1. The original Will deed dated 29.10.2015 was marked as Ex.P1 and the death certificate of Shanthi Subramaniam was marked as Ex.P2. The consent affidavits was marked as Ex.P5.

¶7

The petitioner also examined C.R.Lakshmi as P.W.2 and Mr. G.V.Subramaniam as P.W.3. They were the attesting witnesses. G.V.Subramaniam is also incidentally the respondent. They both identified the Will and also identified the signatures. They specifically stated that the testatrix was in a sound and disposing state of mind when the Will was executed.

¶8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶9

O.P.No.113 of 2022

¶10

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶11

nst

¶12

5.In view of the evidence adduced, I hold that there is every reason to

¶13

grant the relief sought in the Original Petition namely, granting Letters of Administration with Will annexed.

¶14

6.With the above observations, this Original Petition stands allowed.

¶15

The petitioner is directed to duly administer the properties and credits of the deceased more fully described in the schedule. The petitioner is directed to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) in favour of the Assistant Registrar (O.S.II) High Court, Madras. The petitioner is further directed to render true and correct accounts once in a year.

¶16

17.10.2022

¶17

nst

¶18

O.P.No.113 of 2022

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Arjjun Chander v. G.v.Subramaniam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjjun Chander v. G.v.Subramaniam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Ravi Vs Bhuvaneshwari

S. Santha Vs S.v.Ramamurthy and 3 Others

Ramakrishnan Rajagopal and Another Vs No Respondent

Bharathi @ Bharathi Devi and 9 Others Vs Nil

P.K.Kumar and 4 Others Vs P.B. Mohanraj Another

Will (7) of Vs v.Manickaraj