The court directed the Registry to re-issue the acquittal decrees in O.A. Nos. 73, 74 of 2022 after correcting a lacuna by inserting the relevant logo.
The Registry is directed to re-issue the decretal order after inserting the relevant logo in page 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.A.Nos.73, 74 of 2022
O.A.Nos.73, 74 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.23 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The matter is listed today upon "being mentioned" by learned counsel for the applicant. By order dated 08.06.2022 O.A.Nos.73 and 74 of 2022 were dismissed / disposed of. Upon obtaining a copy of the decretal order, learned counsel for the applicant points out that there is an empty space in the space intended for the relevant logo, both in respect of O.A.Nos.73 and 74 of 2022. Since the applicant intends to carry the matter in appeal, it is stated that the decretal order be issued after filling up this lacuna.
14.10.2022
rna
1/2
O.A.Nos.73, 74 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
O.A.Nos.73, 74 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.23 of 2022
14.10.2022
2/2
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
