// of The Managing Director v. Thangamani
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition sought a mandamus directing state authorities to act on a representation alleging misappropriation of Panchayat funds by elected officials. The court directed the District Collector to consider the representation on merits within four weeks after hearing all concerned.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the District Collector to consider the representation dated 26.7.2022 on merits and pass orders within four weeks after hearing all concerned.
W.P.No.26297 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.09.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.26297 of 2022
R.Rajendiran
.. Petitioner
Vs
- 1.The Director, Vigilance Anti-Corruption, No.283, M.K.N.Road, Alandur, Chennai.
- 2.The District Collector, Mayiladuthurai District, Mayiladuthurai.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court should direct the District Collector to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation regarding misappropriation of Panchayat funds?
What is the time limit within which the District Collector must consider the representation after the court's order?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Rajendiran
- respondent
The Director, Vigilance Anti-Corruption
- respondent
The District Collector, Mayiladuthurai
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai
- respondent
M.Chozharajan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court