Disposed

R.Syed Abdul Kadhar v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC9 Sept 2022HCP(MD)/1491/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a habeas corpus petition filed by a husband seeking production and remand of his missing wife and minor daughter, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court observed that the wife and child were present before the Court on the day of hearing. The petition was closed after the parties expressed willingness to live together peacefully.

What did the court decide?

The habeas corpus petition stands closed as the wife and minor child are present and willing to live with the husband peacefully.

R.Syed Abdul Kadhar Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

H.C.P.(MD) No.1491 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.09.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

H.C.P.(MD) No.1491 of 2022

R.Syed Abdul Kadhar

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police,

¶11

Madurai District, Madurai.

¶12

2.The Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of the detenue namely Kuthupunisha, wife of Syed Abdul Kathar, daughter

¶14

Page 1 of 5

¶15

H.C.P.(MD) No.1491 of 2022

¶16

of Abul Barakath, female, aged about 25 years and child namely Afeekah, daughter of Syed Abdul Kathar, female, aged about 5 years before this Court and set them at liberty.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Mohammed Arif

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

[Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.]

¶21

This habeas corpus petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's wife / detenue viz ., Kuthupunisha, aged about 25 years and daughter Afeekah, aged about 5 years, before this Court and set them at liberty.

¶22

It is the case of the petitioner that on account of marital discord, his wife Kuthupunisha, aged about 25 years and daughter Afeekah, aged 5 years, went missing from 08.07.2022 and that the police are not taking effective steps to secure them. Hence, the present habeas corpus petition has been filed with the above prayer.

¶23

Page 2 of 5

¶24

H.C.P.(MD) No.1491 of 2022

¶25

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the petitioner,

¶26

Kuthupunisha along with the minor child, are present before this Court.

¶27

When we enquired, both the petitioner and his wife Kuthupunisha stated that they are willing to live together peacefully and ready to resolve all the marital disputes amicably.

¶28

In such view of the matter, this Court would expect both the parties will

¶29

be living together peacefully and recording the above submissions made by the parties, this habeas corpus petition stands closed.

¶30

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 09.09.2022

¶31

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No pkn

¶32

Page 3 of 5

¶33

H.C.P.(MD) No.1491 of 2022

¶34

To:

¶35

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶36

2.The Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Madurai District.

¶37

Page 4 of 5

¶38

H.C.P.(MD) No.1491 of 2022

¶39

R.MAHADEVAN, J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶40

pkn

¶41

H.C.P.(MD) No.1491 of 2022

¶42

09.09.2022

¶43

_____________ Page 5 of 5_

R.Syed Abdul Kadhar v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Syed Abdul Kadhar v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

I. Robert Chandra Kumar Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Christoper Selvaraj Vs The District Collector

Murugesan. S Vs The District Collector

The Secretary Vs the Director of Town & Country

Elumalai Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Balasubramanian, Vs The District Collector