Itc Limited v. Subash Mittai
Case brief
What is this about?
The suit was for recovery of a sum and interest due on supplies. The defendant was set ex parte for non-appearance. Evidence produced by the plaintiff was accepted unchallenged, and the claim was decreed.
What did the court decide?
Defendant directed to pay Rs. 2,74,20,659/- with interest at 12% p.a. from date of plaint and to pay costs.
What the court decided
C.S. No.289 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.12.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
C.S.No.289 of 2021
ITC Limited Education and Stationery Products Business, ITC Centre, 5th Floor, No.760, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002 Rep. By itS Management Accountant, Power of Attorney Holder Mr.Hardik Patel .. Plaintiff vs.
Mr.Subash Mittal S/o.Shree Gulab Chand Agrawal, Proprietor, M/s.Neer Trading Company, Krishna Kunj, Opposite Agra Vatika Saraswati Kund, Mathura 281 001 Uttar Pradesh. ... Defendant
PRAYER : Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules Read with Order VII Rule 1 CPC prays for a judgment and decree against the Defendant (a) for a sum of Rs.2,74,20,659/- (Rupees Two Crore Seventy Four Lakh Twenty Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Nine only) together with interest at the rate of 24% on Rs.1,49,65,442/- (Rupees One Crore
1/7
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the outstanding sum and interest based on evidence under Order VII Rule 1 CPC.
Coram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court