Rajarethinam, v. Chinnappan (Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition was closed because the Registry informed the court that the main suit was disposed of, leaving no matter to adjudicate. The petitioner also argued the parties were deceased.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD)No.981 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 19.10.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(MD)No.981 of 2019 and CMP(MD)No.5531 of 2019
Rajarethinam
: Petitioner
Vs.
Chinnappan (Died) Aathi Nattar
: Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 31.01.2019 passed by the District Munsif Court, Lalgudi, in I.A.No.225 of 2018 in O.S.No.343 of 2012 and set aside the same.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajarethinam
- respondent
Chinnappan (Died)
Coram
B.PUGALENDHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court