Dismissed
Chandra v. K. Manoharan
Madras HCCRP(MD)/321/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS CHALLENGING INTERIM ORDERS IN A SUI GENERIS SUIT WERE DISMISSED AS ACRESAMECTION BECAUSE THE MAIN SUIT WAS ALREADY DISMISSED ON THE DATE OF HEARING.
What did the court decide?
Closure of Civil Revision Petitions and connected Miscellaneous Petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C.R.P PD(MD)No.321 to 323 of 2020
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
Dated: 13.10.2022
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
¶6
C.R.P(MD)Nos.321 to 323 of 2020 and CMP(MD) No.1820 of 2020 in CRP(MD)No.322 of 2020
¶7
Mrs.Chandra
¶8
... Petitioner
¶9
Vs
¶10
- 1.K.Manoharan 2.K.Leelavathy 3.N.Santhi 4.P.Kalavathy
¶11
- 5.Venkatesh
¶12
- 6.V.Gopi 7.Perumalsamy
¶13
... Respondents
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mrs. Chandra
- respondent
K. Manoharan
- respondent
K. Leelavathy
- respondent
N. Santhi
- respondent
P. Kalavathy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court