K.Manoharan v. P.Revathy
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a civil revision petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction for the disposal of pending matrimonial proceedings. The court directed the principal sub judge to dispose of the case within one year.
What did the court decide?
Direction to dispose of HMOP No.3 of 2019 within one year from the date of receipt of the order.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.273 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 21.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
C.R.P(MD)No.273 of 2020
K.Manoharan
... Petitioner
Vs
P.Revathy ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, directing the learned Principal Sub Court, Dindigul to dispose of the HMOP No.3 of 2019 within a time that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthikeyavenkatachalapathy For Respondent : No appearance
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul to dispose of pending matrimonial proceedings within a fixed time
Whether a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 can be utilized to ensure disposal of delayed civil cases
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Manoharan
- respondent
P.Revathy
Coram
B.Pugalandhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court