Dismissed

K. Mokkaraj, v. Soundharya

Madras HC20 Dec 2022CRP(MD)/2525/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed to strike down a plaint regarding property title disputes. The petitioner argued the suit was not maintainable without exhausting revision under the Patta Pass Book Act. The Court held the suit was maintainable under Section 14 and dismissed the revision, allowing the points to be raised before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

No costs, liberty to raise points before the trial court, and consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

K. Mokkaraj, Vs Soundharya — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

C.R.P PD(MD)No.2525 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated: 20.12.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.2525 of 2022 and CMP(MD) No.12398 of 2022

¶7

K.Mokkaraj ... Petitioner Vs

¶8

1.Soundharya 2.Rasu 3.Mayilammal

¶9

... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike down the plaint in O.S.No.159 of 2022, on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.C.T.Perumal

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner is the first defendant in the suit in O.S.No.

¶14

159 of 2022 and he filed this Civil Revision Petition to strike down the

¶15

plaint, which is pending on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial

¶16

1/6

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.R.P PD(MD)No.2525 of 2022

¶19

Magistrate Court No.I, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

¶20

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶21

suit in O.S.No.159 of 2022 was filed by the respondent herein as against the petitioner and two others, before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Usilampatti for the relief of declaration. According to the petitioner, the property in R.S.No.517/6A admeasuring 0.20.0 Ares, R.S.No.517/7 admeasuring 0.02.2 Ares and R.S.No.517/8 admeasuring 0.11.5 Ares of Thottappanaickanur Village,Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai belonged to the petitioner's father, namely, P.Karuppannan and after his demise, the properties devolved on the petitioner as he is the legal heir. Subsequently, patta with regard to R.S.No.517/6A and 517/7 has been transferred in the name of the respondents herein and patta with regard to R.S.No.517/8 has been transferred in the name of the first respondent. Hence, the petitioner filed W.P(MD) No.4613 of 2022, before this Court to issue a direction to the concerned authority to cancel the patta and transfer the same in

¶22

2/6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P PD(MD)No.2525 of 2022

¶25

the petitioner's name. This Court, by order dated 16.03.2022 directed the authorities to cancel the patta stands in the name of the third parties and transfer the same in favour of the petitioner. Since no action has been taken, the petitioner filed Contempt Petition No.1108 of 2022. Subsequent to the filing of the contempt petition by this petitioner, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, after conducting a detailed enquiry passed an order in Pa,Mu.No.1577/2022/A3, dated 17.08.2022, cancelling the patta in the name of the respondents herein, with regard to R.S.No.517/6A of Thottappanaickanur Village, Usilampatti Taluk, admeasuring 0.20.1 Ares. The grievance of the petitioner is that without availing the revision jurisdiction before the District Revenue Officer, under Section 14 of the Patta Pass Book Act, the respondent/plaintiff filed the above suit and therefore it is not maintainable. Hence, this petition.

¶26

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the materials placed on record.

¶27

3/6

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

C.R.P PD(MD)No.2525 of 2022

¶30

4.As per provision to Section 14, if any person is aggrieved

¶31

as to any right of which he is in possession, by an entry made in the patta pass book under this Act, he may institute a suit against any person denying or interested to deny his title to such right, for a declaration of his rights under Chapter VI of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and the entry in the patta pass book shall be amended in accordance with any such declaration.

¶32

5.In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to

¶33

entertain this Civil Revision Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Liberty is given to this petitioner to raise all these points before the trial Court. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶34

20.12.2022

¶35

Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn 4/6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

C.R.P PD(MD)No.2525 of 2022

¶38

¶39

The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

¶40

5/6

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

C.R.P PD(MD)No.2525 of 2022

¶43

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶44

vrn

¶45

C.R.P(MD)No.2525 of 2022 and CMP(MD) No.12398 of 2022

¶46

20.12.2022

¶47

6/6

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K. Mokkaraj, v. Soundharya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Mokkaraj, v. Soundharya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anbumani Vs Asan Mohamed

Kar Leathers Private Limited, Vs J. Ebenezer Gnanadurai

Karuppi, Vs Shanmugathammal

N.Sankilikaruppu Vs C.Muthurathinam

The Divisional Manager, Vs the South Mumbai District -

S. Periyasamy Vs v. Balakrishnan