Ganesan, v. a.T.Sambandam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as withdrawn by the petitioners based on a letter to the Registrar, thereby closing the connected miscellaneous petition as well.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
CRP(NPD)(MD)No.2447 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(NPD)(MD)No.2447 of 2022 and CMP(MD)No.11935 of 2022
- Ganesan 2. Murugan ... Petitioners
versus
A.T.Sambandam ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C. against the order of proclamation of sale passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Sivagangai in E.P.No.23 of 2017 in O.S.No.59 of 2013 dated 11.10.2022.
For Petitioners : M/s.V.Baskaran For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganesan and Ors.
- respondent
A.T.Sambandam
Coram
B.Pugalandhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court