Dismissed

T.Rajasekar, v. v.Pon Saranya

Madras HC23 Dec 2022CRP(MD)/1995/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a matrimonial dispute where parties resolved issues and intended to file a mutual consent divorce, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed all three connected Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 as no further orders were required.

What did the court decide?

Closed all Civil Revision Petitions as no further orders were required following parties' amicable resolution.

T.Rajasekar, Vs v.Pon Saranya — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1995 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.12.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1995, 2147 and 2285 of 2022

¶7

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1995 of 2022

¶8

T.Rajasekar ... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

V.Ponsaranya ... Respondent

¶11

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, seeking to call for the records pertaining to the Memo filed by the petitioner in H.M.O.P.No.31 of 2021 on the file of the Family Court, Thoothukudi and set aside the order dated 14.09.2022 and direct the Family Court, Thoothukudi to have a joint and consolidated trial in H.M.O.P.No.31 of 2021 and H.M.O.P.No.127 of 2022.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel for M/s.M.Banupriya For Respondent : Mr.KA.Raamakrishnan

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1995 of 2022

¶16

CRP(PD)(MD)No.2147 of 2022

Ponsaranya

... Petitioner

versus

T.Rajasekar

... Respondent

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the Family Court, Tuticorin District to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.31 of 2021 within a specified period.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.KA.Raamakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.V.Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel for M/s.M.Banupriya

¶24

CRP(PD)(MD)No.2285 of 2022

¶25

Ponsaranya ... Petitioner

versus

T.Rajasekar

... Respondent

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the Family Court, Tuticorin District to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.127 of 2022 within a specified period.

¶30

2/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1995 of 2022

¶33

For Petitioner : Mr.KA.Raamakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.V.Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel for M/s.M.Banupriya

¶34

COMMON ORDER

¶35

The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the husband and the learned counsel appearing for the wife submit that the issue is arising out a matrimonial dispute and the parties have amicably resolved their

¶36

issue and they are also intending to file an application for divorce by

¶37

mutual consent.

¶38

In view of the above, all the Civil Revision Petitions are

¶39

closed as no further orders are required. No costs.

¶40

23.12.2022

¶41

ogy

¶42

Note: Issue order copy on or before 05.01.2023.

¶43

3/4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1995 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

The Family Court, Thoothukudi.

¶50

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1995 of 2022

¶51

23.12.2022

¶52

4/4

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

T.Rajasekar, v. v.Pon Saranya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Rajasekar, v. v.Pon Saranya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ananth @ Anthakumar Vs The Inspector of Police

S. Muthaiah Aasari, Vs P. Subramaniyan

T.Parameshwaran @ Suresh Vs S.Lakshmi Priya

Adakkayee Vs Ammakannu

K.Dominic, Vs the Assistant Executive

Pius Moris. P Vs the Managing Director