Disposed

T. Neela, v. K. Jegadeesh

Madras HC2 Nov 2022CRP(MD)/1979/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted a civil revision petition. The court directed the II Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil, to expedite the trial and dispose of the original suit filed in 2012 within six months, noting nearly ten years had elapsed since filing without trial commencement.

What did the court decide?

Directed to expedite trial of OS.No.30 of 2012 and dispose within six months.

T. Neela, Vs K. Jegadeesh — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated: 02.11.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2022

T.Neela

... Petitioner

1.K.Jegadeesh

2.The Thirupananthal Kasimadam Thanjavur District, Represented by Thiruvalar Thiru Kasivasi Muthukumara Swamy Thambiran Swamigal,

¶12

Thanjavur District.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the II Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari to dispose of the original suit in O.S.No.30 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari district as expeditiously as possible within time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ramanathan For Respondent : Mr.M.E.Ilango No.2 For Respondent : No representation No.1

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2022

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This Civil Revision Petition is filed for a direction to the learned II Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari to dispose of the original suit in OS.No.30 of 2012 within time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶21

2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent / plaintiff has filed the suit in OS.No.30 of 2012 for permanent injunction. Though pleadings have been completed, even after passing of ten years of filing of the suit, the trial has not commenced yet. Therefore, the learned counsel prayed for a direction as above.

¶22

3.The suit is filed in the year 2012 and it is claimed that pleadings have already been completed and it is ripe for trial. Considering that the suit is of the year 2012 and trial is not yet commenced, the learned II Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil is directed to expedite the trial in OS.No.30 of 2012 and dispose of the same as 2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2022 expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Civil Revision Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶25

02.11.2022

¶26

dsk To

¶27

The II Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil.

¶28

3/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2022

¶31

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶32

dsk

¶33

CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2022

¶34

02.11.2022

¶35

4/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

T. Neela, v. K. Jegadeesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T. Neela, v. K. Jegadeesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sareena Beevi alias Saritha, Vs M. Sankaralingam

Prabhakaran Vs Mohanapriya

Subbaiah Nadar, Vs Ramalakshmi

Vallikannu Vs The Branch Manager

Selvakumari Vs M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Limited

M.Selvamani, Vs The Tamil Nadu State Election Commission