In this civil revision petition under Article 227 seeking expedited proceedings in an execution case, the Court observed that the disputed amount had already been settled by the petitioner pending the execution petition. Relying on this settlement memo, the Court closed the revision without costs.
The Civil Revision Petition is closed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1679 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.10.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1679 of 2022
Ramamoorthy
... Petitioner
versus
... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai, to expedite the proceedings in E.P.No.37 of 2017 against STC No.453 of 2008.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Hemaraj For R1 : No appearance For R2 and R3 : Mr.K.Baalasundharam
1/4
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1679 of 2022
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai, to expedite the proceedings in E.P.No.37 of 2017 in STC No.453 of 2008.
closed. No costs.
20.10.2022
ogy
2/4
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1679 of 2022
To
3/4
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1679 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1679 of 2022
20.10.2022
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition seeking direction to expedite execution proceedings requires allowing in view that the amount pendente litigate has already been settled.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramamoorthy
Noor Timber Trading Company
N.Farook Mohammed
N.Jafer Ali
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
