S. Ramadoss v. N. Bhanumathi
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged FIR via Cr.P.C. 482. Court quashed proceedings as investigation concluded and charge sheet filed in court below.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed; liberty to petitioners to work out remedies known to law.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
RESERVED ON 14.09.2022 DELIVERED ON 28.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH
Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014 & M.P. (MD) No.1 of 2014
- 1 S.K. Rengasamy 2 R. Mathivanan 3 R. Vijayakumar 4 Kavithakala
- 5 Vidhyapriya
- 6 R. Jeyabharathi 7 Thirupathi Chettiar 8 T. Veera Raj 9 T. Ramamoorthy 10 K. Annamalai Chettiar
- 11 S. Sivanantham 12 R. Rathinam Petitioners vs.
- 1/4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition to quash an FIR survives for adjudication when investigation is completed and a charge sheet is filed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rengasamy and others
- respondent
State represented by its Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Trichy
Coram
P.N. Prakash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court