M.Lakshmi v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought a writ mandamus to change his date of birth in service records to extend superannuation. The court directed authorities to conduct a detailed enquiry to ascertain the correct date given conflicting documents and to pass final orders.
What did the court decide?
Respondents directed to conduct a detailed enquiry into documents filed by petitioner regarding date of birth and pass final orders expeditiously.
What the court decided
W.P.No.19718 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.09.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Writ Petition No.19718 of 2017
A.Natarajan
...Petitioner
-Vs-
- The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai.
- The Director, School Education Department, College Road, DPI Campus, Chennai-6.
- The Joint Director of
- School Education Department (Paniyalar Thoguthi) College Road, DPI Campus, Chennai-6.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the authorities are directed to conduct a detailed enquiry regarding the petitioner's claim for alteration of date of birth?
Whether the respondents must extend the date of superannuation if the date of birth is corrected?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Natarajan
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, School Education Department
- respondent
Director, School Education Department
- respondent
Joint Director of School Education Department (Paniyalar Thoguthi)
- respondent
District Educational Officer, Sathuvachari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court