V.R.Subramanian v. S.Sundari
Case brief
What is this about?
A Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 seeking direction to dispose of an interlocutory application was dismissed as infructuous because the suit was already decreed, rendering no further relief necessary.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD).No.3684 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.01.2022
CORAM:
2016
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(PD).No.3684 of 2016
V.R.Subramanian .. Petitioner
Vs.
S.Sundari
.. Respondent
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for a direction to the Learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu to dispose of the I.A.No.81 of 2015 in O.S.No.48 of 2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jagadish
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Civil Revision Petition remains maintainable when the underlying suit has already been decreed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.R.Subramanian
- respondent
S.Sundari
Coram
V.M.Velumanii
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court