The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution regarding the disposal of an O.P. The petitioner failed to appear through video conferencing, leading to the dismissal of the petition for default.
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)No.3345 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(PD)No.3345 of 2013
A.Prakash .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Agnal Mary 2.Rajan .. Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for a direction to the II Additional Family Court, Chennai, to dispose of O.P.No.3517 of 2011 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : No appearance For R2 : Dispensed with
V.M.VELUMANI, J.
1/2
C.R.P.(PD)No.3345 of 2013
kj
ORDER
(The matter is heard through “Video Conferencing”)
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.01.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
05.01.2022
kj To
II Additional Judge Family Court, Chennai.
C.R.P.(PD)No.3345 of 2013
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition under Article 227 can be dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Prakash
Agnal Mary
Rajan
V.M.Velumani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
