Ganesan, v. Malaiyan
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed civil revision petition against executing court order refusing relief for eviction and demolition due to prior dismissal on similar grounds involving non-impleadment of third party in possession.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order dismissing E.A.No.24 of 2014 was upheld; Revision petition dismissed; costs not mentioned.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2771 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.14180 of 2016
Ganesan ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Malaiyan 2.Pichaikari ... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the fair and decretal order in E.A.No.24 of 2014 in E.P.No.17 of 2011 in O.S.No.102 of 2004, dated 13.04.2016, on the file
of the Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi and thereby allow the revision.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondents : No Appearance O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition is maintainable despite non-impleadment of third party in earlier executed applications deciding same relief.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganesan
- respondent
Malaiyan
- respondent
Pichaikari
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court