Suguna v. Jeyanthi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal filed to set aside an order dismissing a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. for non-appearance of the complainant without following Section 256 Cr.P.C. The order was set aside and proceedings remanded to the trial court.
What did the court decide?
Order of dismissal set aside; appellant to appear; complainant to file affidavit; trial court to complete proceedings within six months.
What the court decided
Crl. A. No.695 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.A. No.695 of 2022
M/s.K.K.Granitile Marketing Rep. by its Proprietor Mr.Gaurav Rajmal Tated S/o.Rajmal Gomchand Tated Aged about 37 years No15/16, Devangapet Street No.2 Near Flower Market Shivan Temple Adjacent Lane Coimbatore - 641 001
Rep. by its Special Power of Attorney Holder Mr.Rajmal Gomchand Tated S/o.Gomchand Tated Aged about 60 years D.No.199-2, Ward No.47 Sukrawarpet, Coimbatore - 641 001
.. Appellant
Vs
1.M/s.N.S.R.Tiles and Granites Rep. by its Proprietor Smt.Sudha W/o.Suresh Kumar No.8/1702E, Thiru Nagar Sadhasivam Avenue P.N.Road, Near Reliance Petrol Bunk Pooluvappatti Post Tiruppur - 641 602
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order dismissing a private complaint for non-appearance of the complainant warrants interference as it was not decided on merits.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s.K.K.Granitile Marketing Rep. by its Proprietor Mr.Gaurav Rajmal Tated
- respondent
M/s.N.S.R.Tiles and Granites
- respondent
Smt.Sudha W/o.Suresh Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court